Assault on Wikileaks is an unprecedented threat to journalism
Wikileaks has brought egalitarianism in journalism
New Delhi, March 5, 2013: A Round Table on 'WikiLeaks, Press Freedom and Status of Legal Cases Against WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, the founder and editor-in chief', dwelt on the implications of vicious attack on the Wikileaks and their sources for the future of journalism across the globe.
The Round Table started with a presentation by Ms Jennifer Robinson who is an Australian human rights lawyer and member of the legal team for Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.
After briefing the participants including journalists, lawyers, researchers, union leaders and students about the status of the legal cases against WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and Bradley Manning, Ms Jennifer Robinson said, “Any criminal prosecution of Assange or Wikileaks in the USA will raise serious concern for Press Freedom everywhere including India”.
Ms Robinson has acted for Assange in extradition proceedings in London brought by Sweden and advised WikiLeaks through the publication of Cablegate. She has also attended the Bradley Manning proceedings in the United States on behalf of WikiLeaks and worked together with the Center for Constitutional Rights to compel disclosure of materials in those proceedings (US v Bradley Manning). She explained the legal situation facing Assange, who has been granted political asylum by Ecuador in order to protect him from persecution in the US but remains in the Ecuador embassy in London, and provide an update on the Bradley Manning proceedings and the ongoing criminal investigation into Wikileaks in the US.
Commenting on her presentation, Arun Kumar, Member, Press Council of India said, “Indian journalistic community have the issues like whether exposing of war crimes, corporate crimes, large scale human rights violations by State actors and corporate citizens as well as the protection of sources and egalitarianism in journalism as most important for survival of journalism across the globe and each and every journalist and freedom loving citizen should join hands with Julian Assange as described by Jennifer Robinson in her experience sharing with us have in the Round Table.”
Arun Kumar is also the President, The Times of India Newspaper Employees Union, Patna, General Secretary, Bihar Working Journalists Union, Patna and Member National Executive Committee, Indian Journalists Union.
Reflecting on Ms Robinson’s presentation, Anand Swarup Verma, Editor, Teesari Duniya said that the role of USA in impeding fair national security journalism is being exposed by Wikileaks. Its expose has brought the patronage being given to surveillance technology companies in the public domain.
Prashant Bhushan, the eminent Supreme Court lawyer argued that journalists who are whistle-blowers should get immunity even if some laws get violated. He argued for a UN Convention for the protection of whistle-blowers.
For Details: Gopal Krishna, Member, Citizens Form for Civil Liberties (CFCL), Mb: 9818089660 (Delhi), E-mail: email@example.com
Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL) has been campaigning against unregulated biometric, surveillance and identification technology companies since 2010 and had appeared before the Parliamentary Standing Committee, Finance in this regard. CFCL has consistently underlined that the silence of the States which are quite vocal about threats to federal structure from Union Home Ministry‘s National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC) and National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) that integrates 21 sets of databases in the matter of the creation of UID’s Centralized Identities Data Register (CIDR) disregarding the fact that Planning Commission’s CIDR and Home Ministry’s National Population Register (NPR) is inexplicable. CFCL is associated with MediaVigil, an association of mass communication practitioners engaging since March 2004 with the issues of democratisation of communication and the right to communicate without which the freedom of expression is meaningless.
Popular posts from this blog
In every step where an attempt is made to unravel the conspirators behind the assassinations and killing, there is an attempt to subvert it and suppress it. By the way will CPI-ML and others tell how often have the Commission's unearthed the truth? Why is CPI-ML and other political parties interested in the lies or half truths which Commission's give birth to? Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose continues to be in news 60 years after his disputed death. A BBC poll named Netaji the third most popular leader in South Asia after Jinnah and Gandhi. Netaji is supposed to have died at the end of Second World War. Netaji went missing while waging war for India 's freedom and in heart of hearts all Indians wish to know what happened to him. Nehru did institute the Shah Nawaz Khan Committee in 1956 after the Indian newspapers broke the news (based on agancy reports) on August 25, 1945 that Netaji had died in a freak plane crash in Taipei (Taihoku) on August 18th, 1945 . Nehru'
By mediavigil -
Statement to the Supreme Court and to the Public of India at large. We, the below named, practicing members of the bar in India, have noted with dismay, the judgment of the Supreme Court, in Mr. Prashant Bhushan's contempt case. An independent judiciary consisting of independent judges and lawyers, is the basis of the rule of law in a Constitutional democracy. Mutual respect and the absence of coercion, are the hallmarks of a harmonious relationship between the bar and bench. Any tilting of the balance, one way or the other, is deleterious both to the institution and the nation. An independent judiciary does not mean that judges are immune from scrutiny and comment. It is the duty of lawyers to freely bring any shortcomings to the notice of bar, bench and the public at large. While some of us may have divergent views on the advisability and content of Mr. Prashant Bhushan's two tweets, we are unanimously of the view that no contempt of court was intended or committed especially
By Krishna -
By EILEEN SULLIVAN 03/22/12 09:36 PM ET WASHINGTON — The U.S. intelligence community will now be able to store information about Americans with no ties to terrorism for up to five years under new Obama administration guidelines. Until now, the National Counterterrorism Center had to immediately destroy information about Americans that was already stored in other government databases when there were no clear ties to terrorism. Giving the NCTC expanded record-retention authority had been called for by members of Congress who said the intelligence community did not connect strands of intelligence held by multiple agencies leading up to the failed bombing attempt on a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas 2009. "Following the failed terrorist attack in December 2009, representatives of the counterterrorism community concluded it is vital for NCTC to be provided with a variety of datasets from various agencies that contain terrorism information," Director of National Intelligenc