Without the right to communicate and democratisation of communication, the right to life, justice, freedom of speech and expression is meaningless. Since 2004 MediaVigil attempts to keep track of traditional offline and digital media that faces the onslaught of monopolistic tendencies and is wary of regressive localisation of media. MediaVigil invites narratives and write-ups on truth about covid19. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org For Details: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mediavigil/info
Civil Liberties activists walk out of Justice VM Tarkunde Memorial Lecture
activists walk out of Justice VM Tarkunde Memorial Lecture
New Delhi/ November 23, 2012: Civil Liberties activists who were
present at the Sixth
Justice VM Tarkunde Memorial Lecture walked out in protest when Nandan
Manohar Nilekani, Chairman, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) began
his speech. The walk out was a protest against Nilekani being invited to
deliver the lecture in memory of the stalwart of human rights and civil liberties,
Justice Tarkunde. The UID project has been challenged since its inception. The
activists who walked out of the lecture have repeatedly tried to engage with Nilekani
at various public platforms but he has consistently declined to answer their
questions or enter into any discussion with them.
The activists circulated a Statement
of Concern on UID which included demands like "The project be halted, a
feasibility study be done covering all aspects of this issue, experts be tasked
with studying its constitutionality, the law on privacy be urgently worked on
(this will affect matters way beyond the UID project), a cost: benefit analysis
be done and a public, informed debate be conducted before any such major change
be brought in."
This statement was
issued on September 28, 2010 by Justice VR Krishna Iyer, Retired Judge, Supreme
Court of India, Prof Romila Thapar, Historian, Late K.G.Kannabiran, Senior
Civil Liberties Lawyer, Kavita Srivastava, PUCL Aruna Roy, MKKS, Nikhil Dey,
MKKS, Late S.R.Sankaran, Retired Secretary, Government of India, Deep Joshi,
Independent Consultant, Prof. Upendra Baxi, Jurist and ex-Vice Chancellor of Universities
of Surat and Delhi, Uma Chakravarthi, Historian, Shohini Ghosh, Teacher and
Film Maker, Amar Kanwar, Film Maker, Bezwada Wilson, Safai Karamchari Andolan,
Trilochan Sastry, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, and Association
for Democratic Reforms, Prof. Jagdish Chhokar, ex- Indian Institute of
Management, Ahemdabad and Association for Democratic Rights, Shabnam Hashmi,
ANHAD and Justice A.P.Shah, Retired Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi.
But till date these concerns and questions remain unanswered.
The organizers rushed to tried to take back
the papers. As the activists walked out the organizers termed the peaceful and
silent distribution of the Statement of Concern on UID as ‘trouble’.
The PUCL had already disassociated
itself from the program. In a letter to the human rights community, People's Union for Civil lIberties (PUCL) said, “We had issued a statement where we made
explicit that our opposition to UDIAI has not changed nor our continuing to
oppose the UID project. We had also spoken to and followed by writing to the
organisers informing our stand on UIDAI, that selection of a person like Mr.
Nilekani is contradictory to the very ideals
that Justice Tarkunde's work and persona reflected, and therefore the
demand for calling off the lecture as also that we did not want to be
associated with the event.”
For Details: Gopal Krishna, Member,
Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), Mb: 9818089660,
Statement to the Supreme Court and to the Public of India at large.
We, the below named, practicing members of the bar in India, have noted with dismay, the judgment of the Supreme Court, in Mr. Prashant Bhushan's contempt case. An independent judiciary consisting of independent judges and lawyers, is the basis of the rule of law in a Constitutional democracy. Mutual respect and the absence of coercion, are the hallmarks of a harmonious relationship between the bar and bench. Any tilting of the balance, one way or the other, is deleterious both to the institution and the nation. An independent judiciary does not mean that judges are immune from scrutiny and comment. It is the duty of lawyers to freely bring any shortcomings to the notice of bar, bench and the public at large. While some of us may have divergent views on the advisability and content of Mr. Prashant Bhushan's two tweets, we are unanimously of the view that no contempt of court was intended or committed especially …
In every step where an attempt is made to unravel the conspirators behind the assassinations and killing, there is an attempt to subvert it and suppress it. By the way will CPI-ML and others tell how often have the Commission's unearthed the truth? Why is CPI-ML and other political parties interested in the lies or half truths which Commission's give birth to? Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose continues to be in news 60 years after his disputed death. A BBC poll named Netaji the third most popular leader in South Asia after Jinnah and Gandhi. Netaji is supposed to have died at the end of Second World War. Netaji went missing while waging war for India's freedom and in heart of hearts all Indians wish to know what happened to him. Nehru did institute the Shah Nawaz Khan Committee in 1956 after the Indian newspapers broke the news (based on agancy reports) on August 25, 1945 that Netaji had died in a freak plane crash in Taipei (Taihoku) on August 18th, 1945. Nehru's promptness …
Supreme Court is due to hear the matter of SS Norway (Blue Lady)on 22nd January 2007. There are two clarification applications pending before the court in the wake of the September 6 and September 11, 2007 order by the Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S H Kapadia bench.
The Supreme Court had also directed Government of India to constitute a new Committee consisting of MoEF, GPCB, GMB, AERB that shall verify all the documents before ship is allowed for breaking. This committee is yet to be formed.
European and Norwegian silence in the matter especially in the aftermath of Le Clemenceau precedent is deafening.
On 7th January, 2008, UN delegates visited Alang and took pictures of SS Norway (Blue Lady) and proved both international and national media that had misreported that the ship has been dismantled wrong. Some 30 ships await permission from the apex court.
Also Le Clemenceau has not been dismantled yet. It might get permission until the end of 2008. In Brest, the French Defe…